Table of Contents
Previous Chapter The forecast database contains both general and service-specific weather elements. In addition to these forecaster-edited elements, some forecast-specific product parameters are needed by the text generators. Derivation of these product parameters from the weather elements is described in Chapter 7. All of these are part of the AWIPS database.
The worksheet concept provides the forecaster great flexibility by allowing the forecast to be generated with input from a wide variety of data sources. Typically, forecasters will use several reference worksheets. One can be constructed, using predefined algorithms, from the output of each numerical model. Another will contain the forecast grids manually prepared at NMC. The forecaster will be able to refer to these fields and copy them as desired into the forecast worksheet. For example, a forecaster could generate two reference worksheets, each based on a different model, then choose the features that are handled best by each model and build a composite worksheet that utilizes each model's strengths. The graphical editors are used to modify these first-guess fields. Interpolation tools will be provided to fill in missing times so the forecaster is not required to edit every matrix element.
The final worksheet containing the desired forecast solution is saved in the database as the official forecast. All text forecasts are generated from this database.
General weather elements (those applying to multiple services) will be created directly from guidance. After forecaster editing, other general elements may be derived. For example, maximum relative humidity, used in agricultural and fire weather forecasts, is derived from dew point and temperature. Service-specific elements will be derived from the general elements and, in many cases, other data.
The general/specific weather element concept is aimed at reducing forecaster workload, while allowing him or her to work in a logical progression through the forecast process. The design is a trade-off between conflicting requirements to automate an inherently hands-on process.
The weather element sets may undergo revision as work on this project progresses. The lists will be reviewed by NWS management and the AFPS Forecaster Working Group (AFWG)(1) to ensure that they are adequate for all products to be generated.
Table 1 - General Weather Elements --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weather Element Descriptors Data Type(a) Spatial Representation(b) Temperature Numerical Continuous Dew Point Numerical Continuous Wind Speed, Direction. Gust Numerical Continuous
Amount, Type, Probability(c) Categorical Bounded Area Clouds Base, Topc Numerical Bounded Area Weather Type, Intensity, Coverage Categorical Bounded Area Sky Condition Categorical Bounded Area Probability of Precipitation Step-Numerical Continuous QPF Step-Numerical Continuous Visibility Step-Numerical Bounded Area Snow Accumulation Numerical Continuous Freezing Level Numerical Continuous Inversion Type, Top, Base Categorical Bounded Area ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in Chapter 4, considerable QPF guidance will be provided to WFO forecasters. It would be desirable to relate QPF to precipitation intensity and duration (part of the "weather" weather element); this will be difficult, at best. Further, the relationship between QPF and probability of precipitation (PoP) is complex.
QPF grids will be sent from WFOs to RFCs with three probabilities for each accumulation period. Though these have yet to be determined, suppose that they are chosen as 20%, 50%, and 80%. Consider, for example, an area specified at 80% chance of 0.50 inch accumulation. The 50% map might show 0.75 in and the 20% map 1.00 in. In addition, the 50% map might show 0.25 in and the 20% map 0.10 in. That is, there is a 50% chance that between 0.25 in and 0.75 in will occur.
PoP, of course, is the probability of any measurable precipitation. How this relates to QPF probabilities, and how all of these various precipitation elements will work together, will require much study.
Table 2 - Derived General Weather Elements
------------------------------------------------------
Weather Element Data Type Spatial
Representation
Maximum Temperature Numerical Continuous
Minimum Temperature Numerical Continuous
Maximum Relative Humidity Numerical Continuous
Minimum Relative Humidity Numerical Continuous
Sky Condition Categorical Bounded Area
------------------------------------------------------
To-be-developed high-quality derivation techniques will minimize forecasters' need to edit these fields.
Table 3 - Aviation-Specific Weather Elements -- Terminal Forecasts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weather Element(a) Descriptors Data Type Temporal(b)
Representation
Wind Speed, Direction, Gust Numerical Continuous
Type, Amount Categorical Stepped(c)
Cloud
Base Numerical Continuous
Weather Type, Intensity Categorical Stepped
Visibility Step-Numerical Continuous
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4 - Aviation-Specific Weather Elements -- Route Forecasts
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Weather Element(a) Descriptors Data Type Spatial
Representation
Base, Top Numerical Continuous
Cloud
Amount Categorical Stepped(b)
Weather Type, Intensity Categorical Stepped
Surface Visibility Step-Numerical Continuous
Hazards Categorical Stepped
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5 - Fire-Weather-Specific Weather Elements
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weather Element Descriptors Data Type Spatial
Representation
Transport Speed/Direction
Wind Free Air Speed/Direction Numerical Continuous
10-Hour Fuel Moisture Numerical Continuous
Precipitation Duration Step-Numerical Continuous
Haines Index Step-Numerical Continuous
Mixing Depth Numerical Continuous
Stability Categorical Bounded Area
Lightning Activity Level Categorical Bounded Area
Chance of Wetting Rain Step-Numerical Continuous
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 6 - Agriculture-Specific Weather Elements
-------------------------------------------------
Weather Element Data Type Spatial
Representation
Dew Intensity Categorical Bounded Area
Dew Dry-off Time Step-Numerical Continuous
Drying Conditions Categorical Bounded Area
Hours of Sunshine Numerical Continuous
Minimum Dew Point Numerical Continuous
-------------------------------------------------
Table 7 - Marine-Specific Weather Elements
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Weather Element Descriptors Data Type Spatial
Representation
Waves Height Numerical Continuous
Swells Height and Direction Numerical Continuous
Superstructure Icing Categorical Bounded Area
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Occasionally, forecasters will need to define forecasts in higher spatial resolution than supported by the standard forecast grid. To support this requirement, the forecaster will be able to define, store, and reuse special local-effects areas.
There will also be a terminal forecast tool. Suppose a forecaster has forecast responsibility for two airports that are separated by only several kilometers. One lies at the bottom of a valley, and the other is much higher in elevation. Fog has enveloped the entire area, and it is the forecaster's job to predict when the fog will lift, allowing for normal aircraft operations. Expecting the fog to burn off early in the day at the higher airport, while the valley airport remains in fog most of the day, the forecaster creates a general forecast that shows the fog slowly dissipating with time, then uses the terminal forecast tool to define a specific forecast for the valley site that shows fog and low visibility remaining throughout the day.
The choice of resolution will affect the wording in the forecast. For example, if we were to limit ourselves to maximum and minimum temperature, we would not be able to produce rush-hour forecasts or create phrases such as "sharply colder in the afternoon." On the other hand, retaining a 1-hour resolution in later periods may be inappropriate since the guidance will not have that resolution and the forecaster cannot accurately distinguish between one hour and the next after several days, e.g., between hours 95 and 96.
Time in the database will be reckoned from the current hour, rolling forward each hour. Users will work in terms of valid time, so this should not result in any confusion.
In the future, when W/W/A functions are integrated with AFPS, it will be necessary to increase time resolution to 1 minute.
Table of Contents
Next Chapter